Anyway, so far it is like I pormised. This thing (#3) is rather accurate, and most probably what you can hear with this one, you just can't hear with the others.
So, like I said, I guess ...
If you wonder how that by itself can happen ... yeah, well, that should be about my skills.
This is not all that much exciting, and for largest part (I think) comes from having a kind of crazy rememberance of "things" which piece by piece can turn results into better and better. Also, I have this rather strange way of just wanting - or even needing to hear what (this case) you hear. If "you" say you hear something wrong, I trust that. But next is why. I'm keen on finding out why, with the underlaying objective of improving the player. Well, once you have this attitude of doing so, it goes by automation.
Call me crazy ...
So next thing I'm eagerly wating for, is
OR you coming up with another track, because it STILL is no coincidence that both you and Werner have the same complaint;
OR Werner coming up with a track with a similar problem in it.
Also : when he does, you copied your tracks to eachother, or you both like saturated sound.
If you both like saturated sound, people who like saturated sound own a DDDac. I jump to conclusions now ? maybe not, beause
a. Klaus has a DDAC
b. he likes saturated sound.
Hahaha. I don't mean any harm with this, but if you can follow my reasoning, you can follow how I develop the player.
Btw, Vista has better possibilities for accurate sound, so that's why #3 was born, and this might be your direct answer.