All,
Because it was asked elsewhere, here a brief outlay of what Phase Alignment is/does in XXHighEnd.
It should not be used any more.
Right.
(plus I'd think I disabled it per 2.11 - not sure though)
Phase Alignment is
dangerous.
Right again.
Phase Alignment is the most wild trick to let your electronics behave better.
Back at the time everybody used it (this is an XXHighEnd-only), BUT it was under control because it was a hot subject. Thus, everybody grew into it, and only one person blew all of his speaker drivers. So that was quite OK.
Right (not).
(and Phasure paid him the new drivers)
Those with a NOS1 were in luck because they could "trim" the Phase Alignment with their DC-Offset meters. That is, in real time. Not doable without such meters, but it could be pre-set as well with a multi-meter.
It is the most complex piece of software in there, and of course only a phool like me could make it.
So ...
So Phase Alignment plays with DC offset.
It anticipates electronics to behave worse with negative voltage than the positive voltage does. N.b.: Negative voltage is always a derivative from the positive "rail"; it is an extra step (with always additional THD). Btw, don't ask me whether some theory exists that negative can be as good as positive after all, but even if it can, nothing tells that this has been applied in ALL of the circuits in pre-amp, power-amp, and in the end also the DAC of course.
The best part of this whole trip is the avoiding of zero crossing.
Now imagine that each self-respecting PCM DAC (in general these are R/2R DACs) has inherent relatively "huge" problems with the voltage crossing zero, impeded by the "digital code" which causes this. Actually the biggest current (!) step is implied because ALL the bit but one, flip. Thus, those poor D/A chips must apply this when zero is crossed :
00000000 00000000 00000001
11111111 11111111 11111111
... thus because all the bits (but one) need to change state, this draws a relative huge amount of current, but only when the voltage crosses zero.
N.b.: The PCM1704 is quite OK with this zero crossing distortion, but still it measured significantly better on the THD. It also sounded better - and still should;
If it is not active any more, I could reactivate it. But the messages will be larger again. Point is : everybody should measure the DC Offset at the speaker input (hence power-amp output). Speakers won't like this ...
But also : I can imagine that not everything is compatrible with it, like for example the new Pause feature (in Unattended). And when something is not compatible, what happens is that the DC jumps (a big bang). This is not nice for your heart ...
Peter