On another topic.... you recently found that XX sounds better once it is Registered.
Do you have a work around for this yet?
Brent, indeed another topic. So I created one for you ...
I never thought about it until your question ... but running XX UnAttened would take distance from that unintentional phenomenon (and I think UnAttended was brought later than when we found out about the difference in SQ). UnAttended is just possible in demo mode.
My humble suggestion is that you make XX free and charge extra for features that have no affect on sound quality.
Personally I don't think it can work like that. XXHighEnd was created for the sound quality, and any additional features would be kind of stupid to pay for, because *those* are just rather normal features you see all over the place. Also, because those features (mainly the Library Functions) can be near equal, worse or just super bad related to the other players, I won't get myself into "complaints" about that, while actually it was not, is not, and never will be about that. It's just a necessary thing. So a twist as proposed will suggest wrongly IMO.
People might think that "features" like MP3 support is something that doesn't belong in a high end player, and that *that* actually is an example of what people might want to pay for as an additional feature. Well, once you fell in love with XXHighEnd for SQ in the first place I don't think MP3 playback will get any better for SQ in any other player. The SQ of MP3 with a bitrate of 256 and higher is already better than what I perceive from any "normal" USD 100,000+ system playing full quality CDs from a CDP.
Actually with 0.9u this is so outrageously much better again, that maybe a time will come that many with their so called cr*ppy MP3 pile of music will end up with XX. Those who don't care or like the 3D pictures stay with iTunes.
Of course I don't need to respond so extensively to your question and well meant suggestion Brent, but with the above I want to make clear that my heart is in the sound quality and that stupids like me even work big time on the best SQ of MP3. Do I do this to satisfy some teenagers (who are well over 30 now
) ? no. I do this because MP3 isn't inheritently worse. It's the stuff around it (like playback) that s*cks. Try it.
And on another note : CD singles just died, and are brought to you for free now in MP3 format.
Concluded, it is sound quality what I hunt for (including "2 times better each other few months"
) and it is that what one pays for.
Peter