Scaling down the resolution is not an option for me as i use other programs which needs 1080p. And, the defacto standard res these days both on graphics cards and displays are 1080p.
Let me enlighten you (all) a bit ...
First off, no way 1920x1080 is a defacto standard. Not these days, nor will it be tomorrow. That is, not until the time we all work with 23" or larger displays. And will we ever ? I don't think so.
So, both feet on the ground, anyone using a normal sized display (allowing 1920x1080 anyway) will not use any random application. And don't tell me something like Word is amongst that, allowing to scale the font size on the fly.
What you'd actually want is a larger "form" which doesn't comprise of 640x480 (which is kind of what XX is made for) but 1280x1024 at least. Then everything will be larger and large enough. However :
The problem is not that XX is too small or anything, the problem is that you use a too small display with a resolution of 1920x1080. Nice for pictures and movies, but a too high resolution for any normal application.
The lot is scalable allright, like it will at setting the OS-wide "scale factor", but I don't know whether this can be used somehow outside of the OS scale factor. If it can I obviously will allow to apply it, but if it can't ... bad luck.
And please, we can't turn this the other way around : make it larger for a strange (
) 1920x1080 setup, while someone like Johan (with a 640x480 screen) won't be able to use it at all (one button would use half of his screen).
If you can't agree or have better ideas, anything, please let me know.
Peter
PS: One more thing : This is not about buttons being too small, it is about buttons being to close to eachother (think touch screen especially). This means that making buttons larger (while the screen stays the same), it gets worse. Please try to get this.
