Thank you Gerner.
On the <list> things, you'd have to remove the ones on top and at the bottom. I know you did not put them there, but it happens when you do something else wrong (unmatched li tags).
Btw, if you have one <list> pair (you have three) you'll achieve the same by having an empty line before each </li>.
On to the music ...
9K had the openess so defined in most XX-versions, but now with a much higher contend and richer glow and boddy to the music. Yes, the cello got the boddy back and the harmonics are shining or singing if you like.
Yes, very recognizeable. One of the most occurring things is the harmonics. If we could measure that by (church) bells, I've never heard them so beautiful. And I mean BEAUTIFUL.
Without giving up the open spaciousness and the resloving power the player has, a tad more focus on the timbre: The inside the music details inner handshake that leads to the close to live music sound. This 5th element thing that ties everything together and leaves you believing this is really the live musicians I have standing there in front of you.
The Q1 cannot do that job for me. If it's a job at all to deal with?
Well, since we go on and on with the improvements, I guess Yes. But, currently I would not know how without destroying other things. If you'd ask me, now the jitter is nicely spread over the frequency spectrum, which doesn't say much about the jitter level itself. Thus, if I could maintain the spreading, but decrease the level ... you never know what happens. And mind you, "the" DAC has physical limitations which I can't influence by software throughout. So somewhere it stops with "the" DAC ("the" = anyone's, and they are all different).
But I still have a couple of ideas. Other things first now.
Peter
