I feel that the hirez tracks need a new point of view. The first time I heard them I was a little bit disappointed and thougth that the sound is too "cool". But with every step lessening the electrical and acoustical interferences I got a better and more interesting soundstage. I think that this was only the start for a new experience. What do you think?
Georg
AGREED,and you can make 2 catagories:
The old (60s,70s, 80s, 90s) remastered stuff, like Doors, Oldfield,Alice Cooper etc, can sometimes be dissapointing because of "bad" mastering. (wich ist just neccasry because its taken from analog masters) those albums just wont get any better
And mostly the normal 16/44 albums with Arc Prediction sounds way better.
BUT, the newer stuff from e.g. HDtracks like Chesky Records and offcourse all the stuff from Linn and 2L is doing a much greater job, because of the better recording techniques
like DDD, DSD, DXD (HDCD). (and mostly these record labels also take care in their cabling and mics (placement) used for the recordings)
I also think xx evolved in handling these (and overall 16/44) files better and just because of the plain new versions updates ofcourse.
So do give the "better" sounding HDtracks albums a listen and buy some because it can be worthwhile.
Also a new link:
http://www.bowers-wilkins.com/display.aspx?infid=3550http://www.bowers-wilkins.com/display.aspx?infid=3550&terid=4961http://blog.bowers-wilkins.com/lab/sound-quality-lab/the-definitive-guide-to-24-bit-flac/The B&W Digtal Timeline thread should end with (read the above link) :
2007 - Introducing the PC playback software XXHighEnd by PeterSt
2010 - Introducing XXHighEnd 1.0 Version
Still curious about peoples findings with ARC on these 96 (and 192) albums (I am restricted to 88.2 for now)
Cheers,
PS: 2-0 is a good start for the new FIFA world champions!!