Thank you for your extended elaboration, Joachim.
I think the (main) problem is that you call it "works flawlessly" while actually nothing works.
So what you (have to) do next is apply all kind of unnecessary stuff to get it to work for what you think is OK (for your ears - which is fine) and next advise it to others.
This, while all conflicts which what is already in there.
And seriously, it does not matter whether it is about defender, updates, eliminating services or MMCSS (and all more, mentioned so far) - this is all
explicitly dealt with by XXHighEnd
THUS per different means.
Sorry about the emphasized "thus" but I obviously know.
Maybe an example :
How can I guide someone to Group Policy stuff to eliminate Defender, while first something else has eliminated the whole option from there ? (this is about Esau's link). Please keep in mind that the Tutorials are there already.
No such things as Tutorials upon a STANDARD OS can exist if people first tear it down per various (unknown !) means.
One other example which is NOT meant to make it personal, but to indicate how difficult things can be, which not everybody can see, including yourself :
You are as far as I can tell the only one who could not get the 1.04 driver going. You said you applied all. But you did not and instead skipped the XXHighEnd settings at first. I know (your system shows that). This, btw, is when I told you that "sequences" are as important as applying the subjects involved in the first place.
So I had to make another "tweak" for people like you (and hey, this is thus not about you - it can happen, apparently).
But what nobody knows/sees (as said, including you) is that I can only build these tweaks upon tweaks (the 1.04 driver is a tweak to begin with) if I can trust the base of the system.
Do you seriously think that I could help (you) with determining what has happened to the system if first another means of "MinOS" has been applied while we don't even know what that all is (100s of things) ?
So all in the best spirit, which most certainly counts for you (Joachim) as well. I am 100% confident about that.
But you must please see through that this is nothing to now advise to others, while it is based upon something nobody has.
I hope it is clear now.
You mentioned with Reply#21 on the forum that it is not your intention to make double work with the “Minimize OS” procedure for the RMT W10
You didn't understand or possibly read half only :
W10 RTM in its 10240 build is more flawed that 10074. This was totally clear to the whole world.
It does not make any sense to again do work for something which is even more flawed.
It first needs another build which works better.Why are you so persistent ?
Peter
