XXHighEnd - The Ultra HighEnd Audio Player
November 23, 2024, 03:50:12 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: August 6, 2017 : Phasure Webshop open ! Go to the Shop
Search current board structure only !!  
  Home Help Search Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2
1  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: Spotify vs XXhighend on: January 11, 2013, 06:44:01 pm
Play MP3 and notice the same ...
(I'm serious)

hi Peter,
do you think they use some sort of filter to produce that soundstage feeling.?
2  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: Spotify vs XXhighend on: January 10, 2013, 11:50:35 pm
the thing i feel is a big soudstage...my phones are closed, they donīt have big soundstage..but in spotify when i ear things around me in space outside my cans.. playing localy i donīt have the same soundstage and separation...
iīm comparing to a streaming service beacause is where i feel diference.. localy the xxhighend is the best player for me.
i donīt know if they use some sort of filter or something..
3  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Spotify vs XXhighend on: January 10, 2013, 11:03:54 pm
i have been listening to the same tracks on both and i donīt know what they are doing in spotify but the soundstage is super i can year on my audiotechnica ath-50 phones where the instruments are and itīs so clear. In xxHighend things are clear too but i not have de same soudstage.
anyone have tested the same tracks on both??
4  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: 0.9z-7-5, PA on 24-bit: We know it works, now for the sound... on: October 26, 2012, 02:26:32 pm
hello peter, i know but the thing is that conexant audio on the sony vaio... to me sounds better timbre more real, more separation and without the arc-predition and peak extend... and iīve searched and itīs a japanese company... and only a few vaios have that card. most of them have realtek chips. the audiphilleo+lavry combo in adaptive mode is nicer but sometimes does not play.
the thing is with the vaio i choose 32 bit on the dac need.
and on the audiphilleo+lavry  i choose 24 bit on the dac need.

is the 32 bit better SQ?

5  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: 0.9z-7-5, PA on 24-bit: We know it works, now for the sound... on: October 26, 2012, 01:26:54 pm
i have another comp (my girfriend sony vaio) with a conexant onboard chip only have engine 3 but the sound for me (i use ath-m50 pro headphones) is better than my other combo (audiophilleo+lavryda11).
on vaio the sound e super clean and the instruments a very well separated.
on the (audiophilleo+lavryda11) the to my years is a more muddy.

note that on the sony vaio i put the option (the dac needs 32 bit).
on the (audiophilleo+lavryda11) i use the dac needs 24 bit.
6  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: 0.9z-7-5, PA on 24-bit: We know it works, now for the sound... on: October 26, 2012, 01:21:44 pm
Hello everyone, here hi have an audiophilleo and i cannot play on engine 4 special mode....
anyone here with audiophilleo???? can play engine 4 special mode?
specs for clock, dac settings, SFS?
can only play adaptive mode but sometimes does play.. other plays.
on engine 3 plays allways.
tks Happy
7  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your questions about the PC -> DAC route / onboard RealtekŪ ALC 887-VD2 or Esi Juli@ for spdif out to dac from htpc on: May 10, 2012, 01:54:58 pm
Hello everyone, i need your opinion because i mounted a desktop pc only for music and i have xxhighend.
for now iīve been feeding my lavry da 11 thru an optical audioquest cable from my RealtekŪ ALC 887-VD2 on board card.
my question is: is it better to by a esi juli@ for spdif out do dac???
it improves the sound quality?? for me the sound now is very good... iīve seen juli@īs mod etc... they claim improve on sound....

what are your opinions??
by the way a have an audiophilleo to but for me the sound of the audiophilleo is not so good (the timbre isnīt so natural, bass and treble extension but no mids at all simple doesīnt sound ok to me)
tks
8  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: 0.9z52 problem with more than 100 minutes files... on: June 16, 2011, 11:58:50 pm
is with the interface open when playing, i have other files with, 80 minutes and i donīt have problems....
i donīt know if because the length of the file or if is the type of the mp3. i had the same issue with another mp3 above 100 minutes...

tks Peter
9  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / 0.9z52 problem with more than 100 minutes files... on: June 16, 2011, 06:39:59 pm
Hi, i having problems on playing files with more than 100 minutes, only gives-me 8 minutes of music than stops...
in another file it only play about 19 minutes than stop....

need help...
one example file for download:
http://soundcloud.com/electro-mix-memory/yostek-2011-04-11-electro-mix

tks... in other players i have no problem with this files..
10  Ultimate Audio Playback / Music Storage and convenient playback / Re: web streaming vs playing from hard drive on: May 18, 2011, 10:54:34 am
I Peter, yesterday i did some tests.... and my conclusion is that xx e very near from what a ear when streaming from web.
the only thing i ear different is my main problem of the treble extension....i think the xx treble is a bit loud, my sensation is that creates earing fatigue(iīm using engine3 wasapi) but the sound is almost there....
maybe with a usb/spdif converter i can use engine4 and maybe the sound is more accurate... Happy
 
11  Ultimate Audio Playback / Music Storage and convenient playback / web streaming vs playing from hard drive on: May 17, 2011, 10:56:25 pm
I to all of you who love good quality sound, i have one question:
in the last days a discovery that when i stream music on-line from some sites, the quality is superb. (exemple: bleep.com)
some times is more pleasant than from xx playback.... why this happen??? anyone experiment this difference???

tks,,,
12  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: CUE FILES on: March 22, 2011, 05:05:26 pm
Hi peter,
the cue thing is resolved......i did as you said.

about my config i have news... i connect the de dac by usb to my laptop and i was able to use KS engine 4, I tried several setups... but i have to lower a lot SFS.
the sounds to have more mids and lows... but donīt have the same definition that i have on engine 3 wasapi....

and i canīt get rid of the ticks and bleeps on engine 4

13  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: CUE FILES on: March 22, 2011, 03:12:58 pm
i Peter Happy tks for the help, i have a onboard realtek high definition sound card that i link to my dac via a optical cable. What i have read is this soundcard as icompability with ks....
what soundcard do you recommend for my asus laptop so i can play engine 4 ???


in relation to cue files... yes tried to drag and does nīt work...Happy how can i play cue files???
tks Wink
14  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / CUE FILES on: March 22, 2011, 02:19:09 pm
I Peter i bought the final version and iīm very satisfied with sound but i have one question...
how can i play from cue files?....i tried to search here in the forum but i didnīt found nothing....
in this case i have a flac and a cue file... how do i play the cue as i play from foobar or others?....

other thing i using engine 3 because my soundcard donīt do ks, and a feel the sound hyper detailed, i think i ear the highs more than mids ans lows...( i think i feel some lack of mids lows...)
do you feel the same in your setup??? how does it feel for for engine 4 in compare to 3????

tks Happy
15  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: XXHighEnd Model 0.9z-4-1 on: March 21, 2011, 10:42:09 pm
tks boleary. what would be a nice soundcard for my laptop to use ks engine4????
Pages: [1] 2
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.131 seconds with 12 queries.