|
Title: Time Stability/Performance Index 2.10 Post by: coliny on March 24, 2018, 05:33:33 pm Patched 2.10 over 2.09 and booting from RAM-OS disk and TS is Stable, TPI is optimal. So all good & as they were in 2.09.
Start 2.10 from RAM however and TS is Not Stable, TPI is Not the best. Applied Refresh of course in both boots. Other settings OK & same for both boots. Colin Title: Re: Time Stability/Performance Index 2.10 Post by: PeterSt on March 25, 2018, 10:56:53 am Hi Colin,
Maybe this is so, maybe it isn't (because I can't reason how it would work and it already was so for you (say lately)) and so the question : Is it correct that you still can get it to work via the normal procedure for it ? But really, as this is an OS "BCD" setting, I can't imagine how a new XXHighEnd version can destroy it without something actively dealing with it. If you have further findings, please let me know. Thank you ! Peter Title: Re: Time Stability/Performance Index 2.10 Post by: coliny on March 25, 2018, 04:22:56 pm Hi Peter
The normal means of changing these setting would be within XXHE Normal OS booted from RAM-OS disk, Yes?. But the time setting are correct already in this boot. Its when I boot it from memory that the setting are wrong. Colin Title: Re: Time Stability/Performance Index 2.10 Post by: PeterSt on March 25, 2018, 08:25:02 pm Hi Colin,
No. The description has been here more often (and I'd say you witnessed that) as when this is your situation, then you'd need to reapply everything which starts with undoing it all. So first explicitly set to "not the best etc.." (can be done in MinOS BASE), and check to be certain once in the RAM boot (should stay as you already have it). THEN set to "best settings" (etc.). And notice that you can only do one by one so it's a lengthy procedure. I recall from the earlier description that it requires 6 boots or so. Point remains : a. did you have it right 100% definitely, previouslly; b. if Yes, what happened that undid it. ... wait ... Hey, nothing is telling me that you had it right !! Your RAM-OS Disk is too new for that and I don't recall we discussed it. So it is that. You just never set it. BUT ALSO : Your RAM-OS Disk is special because it wasn't taken from the standard "SSD Base". See ? never even want such things ... So the BASE for the HDD apparently was never adjusted by me for this. I recall I did for the SSD base alright. Kind regards, Peter Title: Re: Time Stability/Performance Index 2.10 Post by: PeterSt on March 25, 2018, 08:34:38 pm Colin :
XX from RAM differences compared to playing from boot drive (http://www.phasure.com/index.php?topic=3906.msg41842#msg41842). Regards, Peter Title: Re: Time Stability/Performance Index 2.10 Post by: PeterSt on March 25, 2018, 08:36:29 pm Even better :
Setting the Timers for a boot from RAM (http://www.phasure.com/index.php?topic=3919.msg41932#msg41932). Peter Title: Re: Time Stability/Performance Index 2.10 Post by: coliny on March 27, 2018, 08:09:15 am Hi Peter
Sorted now, Perhaps those instructions should be here:- http://www.phasure.com/index.php?topic=3353.msg36270#msg36270 Thanks Colin Title: Re: Time Stability/Performance Index 2.10 Post by: PeterSt on March 27, 2018, 09:00:01 am OK Colin, great.
Quote Sorted now, Perhaps those instructions should be here:- Yes, something like that. But the real problem is that it should be in the RAM-OS Disk. I probably didn't do that (at the time) for the (16GB anticipating) HDD version of it, anticipating that it wouldn't be sold soon (while the SSD for 32GB was/is). And then I forgot ... Good that it solved for you now. Regards, Peter |