XXHighEnd

Ultimate Audio Playback => XXHighEnd Support => Topic started by: Gerard on November 26, 2007, 12:17:07 pm



Title: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: Gerard on November 26, 2007, 12:17:07 pm
Peter,

Correct me if i am wrong but i think the schema's react  different when you start your pc and first play No appointment. Then go to schema 3. and look on the second core!

Than when you it like this.

Start XX play schema 1 an than go to schema 3. ( Look at the 2e core again.)

Maybe i am wrong but it looks different.....



Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: PeterSt on November 26, 2007, 01:06:21 pm

Interesting ...
I did not look myself, but I can imagine it (or something); I think I can even reason out why this happens *and* that SQ will differ in either situation.
Maybe you just found another dimenstion for SQ settings ? :grazy:

Tonight I'll try to see whether I can make something of it (for directions). I think I already know that it can't be changed. But I'll look into that too.

Thank you Gerard,
Peter


Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: PeterSt on November 26, 2007, 05:58:00 pm
Gerard,

I don't see anything special ... (the peak in the NoAppoint is from loading SnagIT).
Btw, don't look too long to below pictures, or you'll need a doctor soon. :grin:


Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: PeterSt on November 26, 2007, 07:00:24 pm
Might it differ (and it can), this was Unattended Playback.


Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: Gerard on November 29, 2007, 12:27:53 pm
Peter ,

I just made pic's from my CPU. The first is the one i get after i first used schema1. The second is the one i get after a restart ( PC) and direct playing schema 3...

It are copies from the 2e core.... And the cpu goes up and down from 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, Unattended.


Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: PeterSt on November 29, 2007, 12:57:23 pm
Without graph of core-1 it doesn't tell me all that much.
It looks strange to me anyway though ...


Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: Gerard on November 29, 2007, 01:16:49 pm
Without graph of core-1 it doesn't tell me all that much.
It looks strange to me anyway though ...


Peter,

I think i found it..... Sometime's the schema's will hang (or something)... the first pic is the one after reboot the pc and direct play 3.... i did random affinity and it shows 2 core's

The second pic is also playing schema 3 but than when i was on schema 1 first... or did some switching between them.... now random affinity and it shows 1 core.


Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: Gerard on November 29, 2007, 01:29:44 pm
Peter,

I think i now how it come's. When you like to change the schema's you have to push stop first. Not change schema and than push stop and than play. When you first change the schema and than press stop and than play it will hang and stay on the one before. ( i think)

  :)



Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: PeterSt on November 29, 2007, 02:37:00 pm
It works a little bit different :

1. Changing the Schemes does nothing by itself.
2. Clicking Play will change the Affinities (and more !) according to the set Scheme at that moment.
3. Clicking Stop will reset everything back to normal as good as possible.

Note that I could make everything according the Schemes(changes) change realtime during Playback, but it would not workout the same.
That I should have mentioned (Release Notes) that the Scheme setting changes do not workout in realtime is another thing ...



Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: Gerard on November 29, 2007, 02:48:07 pm

1. Changing the Schemes does nothing by itself.
2. Clicking Play will change the Affinities (and more !) according to the set Scheme at that moment.


Offcourse the pic's are made when play is pusht....



Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: PeterSt on November 29, 2007, 05:56:33 pm
Yes of course, I just tried to explain to you what happens when.


Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: Gerard on November 29, 2007, 06:00:26 pm
Peter,

I really think you misunderstood. Or i misunderstood you. Than sorry sometime's having trouble reading.

When you do Change, Stop, Play (That is wrong the scheme will actually stay at the last scheme).
Only               Stop, Change, Play ( That will change the schema )


*Change = Change Scheme* 
 

Sorry the post before mind, from you, whe wrote together at the same time.
 
 


Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: PeterSt on November 29, 2007, 06:56:56 pm
Gerard,

I checked it ... this is not the case.
Also note that I did not see anything strange as such in your pictures, as long as I imagine how core-1 looks like, whith the spike in core-2.


Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: Gerard on November 29, 2007, 07:05:58 pm
Gerard,

I checked it ... this is not the case.
Also note that I did not see anything strange as such in your pictures, as long as I imagine how core-1 looks like, whith the spike in core-2.


Well Peter than i do not understand.... It's not the case of the core's anymore.( All come's from the way you choose the schema).. When i start the pc and start playing XX on schema 3 than two core's are checked. (looking at affinity)... When i than go to schema 1  one core is checked..... Do i wish to go to schema 3 and do change, stop, play than one core is checked instead of 2. And that is different than when i start the pc and look at affinity playing schema 3.

 :wacko:

I will put in both pic's


Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: Gerard on November 29, 2007, 07:29:08 pm
Ok here it is...

Peter this is the test after i have been on schema 1 and than wish to go to 3 by pushing (Change, Stop, Play)

I don´t now how it is when you change from 2 to 3 or so.....

The upper two belong together and the two ad the bottom also..

Both combi´s are schema 3.....!!! And watch the affinity from both....


Foto´s 1 en 2 horen bij elkaar... Dit is de situatie als ik de pc opstart en gelijk ga spelen op schema 3.
Foto´s 3 en 4 horen ook bij elkaar en dit laat de situatie zien als ik via schema 1 via change stop play naar schema 3  ga.

Als je dan kijkt naar de affinity dan blijft hij hangen op schema 1. En tevens is de activiteit van de laatste foto de situatie zoals hij bij schema 1 is.

( Sorry for the language )

 :)




Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: PeterSt on November 29, 2007, 08:24:07 pm
Okay, I will try that. But ... this is what you told in the first post :

Quote
Correct me if i am wrong but i think the schema's react  different when you start your pc and first play No appointment. Then go to schema 3

which is different from going immediately to Scheme-3 right after a reboot as you said in your last post (first dutch sentence).

I will try that now ...


Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: Gerard on November 29, 2007, 08:34:26 pm
Okay, I will try that. But ... this is what you told in the first post :

Quote
Correct me if i am wrong but i think the schema's react  different when you start your pc and first play No appointment. Then go to schema 3

which is different from going immediately to Scheme-3 right after a reboot as you said in your last post (first dutch sentence).

I will try that now ...

Well there i was wrong but in this post...

Peter,

I think i found it..... Sometime's the schema's will hang (or something)... the first pic is the one after reboot the pc and direct play 3.... i did random affinity and it shows 2 core's

The second pic is also playing schema 3 but than when i was on schema 1 first... or did some switching between them.... now random affinity and it shows 1 core.


But never mind it is difficult enough....



Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: PeterSt on November 29, 2007, 08:38:06 pm
It is Gerard ... but thanks to your now accurate outlay I can copy that behaviour (and it's not even difficult).
Hmm ...

:oops:


Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: Gerard on November 29, 2007, 08:41:39 pm
It is Gerard ... but thanks to your now accurate outlay I can copy that behaviour (and it's not even difficult).
Hmm ...

:oops:

 :heat: really thought i was getting crazy... haha  :)


Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: Gerard on November 29, 2007, 09:26:19 pm
It even looks like it doesnt go back to 3 and No Appointment at all.... When i push stop, No appointment, play

Affinity shows one core....


So what we have been testing could be very wrong... (Sometime's) because there was a time that it changed...

EDIT: Even when i shut XX down it come's back to 1 core....

EDIT: Well it really looks like that the STOP before the other things really helps... If not it stays ( I think ) at core 1.


Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: PeterSt on November 29, 2007, 10:46:05 pm
And I was just thinking I tested it all so excessivley. Self learning Vista ? :nea:
Must be caused by me somehow.
:wacko:


Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: PeterSt on November 30, 2007, 07:21:12 pm
Phwew ... solved.
Until I upload a next version you can only be sure that all is doing what you intended when right after a reboot the Scheme is selected once before Play.
The reset (e.g. after Stop) is not okay, but I don't think you care.
What it comes to : don't change Schemes during a (boot) session after you played already.


Title: Re: P.A. Schemes behave different at relative changes ?
Post by: Gerard on November 30, 2007, 07:36:37 pm
 :good: :good: :good: